Major Warren’s authority is not concentrated in an identification badge. The film builds it through visible signs and accounts that his interlocutors accept, dispute, or turn against him.
There is no verified record of that badge
The documentation consulted does not allow for identification of any specific military badge whose display certifies Warren’s cavalry rank. It would be wrong to invent an inscription, an identification number, a manufacturer, or a scene in which the object is presented. The fact that the character wears military-looking clothing does not prove that he carries the item described in the query.
The papers relating to the bounties, the letter attributed to Lincoln and the signs of the uniform must also be distinguished. Each serves a different function. The documents concerning the fugitives support an economic activity; the letter alters a relationship of trust; the clothing refers to a past and to a way of presenting oneself. To gather all this under the idea of a badge erases those differences.
Rank has to be recognised by others
Marquis Warren presents himself as a former officer of the Union cavalry. The word major is part of his public name and his reputation. However, that status does not oblige every character to grant him the same respect. Racism and wartime loyalties shape the way military authority is received.
The film shows that a visible sign does not work automatically. A uniform can call experience to mind for one interlocutor and enmity for another. The same garment enters into different relationships depending on who looks at it. That is why reducing Warren’s credibility to an object that supposedly proves everything would run counter to the problem the narrative develops.
Mannix knows stories about the major and uses them to challenge him. Ruth has an earlier memory and a present impression. Neither simply examines a badge and accepts the result. Identity is negotiated through memory, speech, conduct and force, within a society where those resources are not distributed equally.
The props do not replace a verifiable biography
The costume can be analysed as part of the character’s presentation without turning him into a historical military file. Warren is a fictional figure and his clothing belongs to a film production. The similarities with period uniforms do not allow a real career to be reconstructed or documentary authenticity to be assigned to every accessory.
The precise answer to the query is to recognise that limit. There is not enough basis for a record of the supposed badge, but there is enough to observe how the character needs others to recognise his rank. The film turns that need into a conflict: Warren retains an authority that must be defended again and again, even when his appearance seems to announce it before he speaks.
Back to the guide to The Hateful Eight.