A war sequence lets us see Rick in a register different from the TV western. Its showy excess establishes a professional precedent and leaves an object ready to reappear beyond that shoot.
A made-up title within a plausible career
The 14 Fists of McCluskey, known in English as The 14 Fists of McCluskey, is a fictional film in Rick Dalton’s career. Once Upon a Time in Hollywood shows a fragment that is enough to recognize a war adventure with Allied soldiers and Nazi officers. There is no complete historical feature that can be given a detailed plot based on those images.
The title and tone evoke a commando film that turns war into a spectacular mission. Bringing enemies together in a confined space makes for fast, concentrated action. The sequence is not trying to reconstruct a military campaign with documentary precision. It works as a sample of genre entertainment in which the protagonist’s energy and the clarity of the enemy organize the audience’s response.
For Rick Dalton, that credit shows that his career was not limited to a single series. He has occupied a movie screen and has a past he can present to an agent. The film lets us see him, instead of relying only on his memories. The image helps explain why he has trouble accepting that others see him as an actor whose best days are behind him.
His relationship to Bounty Law is one of expanding his professional range. The TV Western hero and the fighter in a war adventure belong to different genres, but both draw on a presence of toughness and decisiveness. Rick can change uniforms without completely abandoning the kind of authority that made him famous. That continuity makes the transition between jobs believable.
The flamethrower as spectacle and lesson
The most recognizable element in the fragment is the flamethrower. The action turns the weapon into the visual center of an over-the-top resolution. The image is immediate and aggressive: fire fills the space and leaves no room for any expectation of an even fight. Within the fictional film, that excess is presented as the triumph of a combatant over a clearly identified enemy.
The story also shows the other side of the shoot through the actor’s unease about the device’s heat. That change in perspective separates the heroic character from the person who has to play him. Rick may look unflappable in the finished result and express concern during preparation. The contrast creates humor and reminds us that the bravery of an image is not the same as the physical comfort of the person making it.
That passage should not be turned into a technical explanation of how to use a flamethrower in real life. The sequence offers a dramatized reaction and a narrative effect, not handling instructions. Its value lies in establishing that Rick has had professional contact with that object and keeps it as part of his past. The story thus prepares a recognizable connection between film work and domestic life.
When the weapon reappears in the final night, the viewer already has that precedent. The solution is extraordinary, but it does not come from a completely unfamiliar object. The film has already provided the information needed for the excess to retain internal logic. The memory of the shoot also changes the tone: a tool of spectacle leaves its original frame and enters Rick’s fictional reality.
A parallel with Inglourious Basterds, without confirmed continuity
The destruction of Nazis by fire makes it possible to draw a formal comparison with Inglourious Basterds. Both films use violence as a cinematic fantasy of punishment. That thematic kinship does not prove that The 14 Fists of McCluskey belongs to the same story or that Rick plays an identifiable character from that work. The comparison should stay at the level of techniques.
The difference between narrative levels also matters. Here we are watching a film within another film and we know the actor taking part in it. The fragment can be valued as part of his career, as entertainment for another character, and as preparation for a later action. That multiplicity of functions sets it apart from a scene that takes place directly in the story’s main world.
The audience can enjoy the war-movie nod without knowing every possible source. The film provides enough signals: uniforms, enemies, infiltration, and an explosive ending. There is no need to assign every shot to a specific tribute in order to understand the effect. Attributing specific references without documentation would reduce a genre evocation to a list of supposed copies.
The fragment gives Rick a victory that belongs to the past and to professional fiction. That victory does not guarantee him work in 1969, but it keeps visible a side of his appeal as a leading man. The scene shows why someone might hire him and why he still wants to headline films. His career contains effective images, even if the industry does not automatically turn them into new opportunities.
The 14 Fists of McCluskey ends up being a small piece with broad consequences. It adds depth to Rick’s history, introduces humor about the manufacture of heroism, and prepares a material return. Its importance does not depend on imagining a complete movie we never see, but on observing how a brief fragment changes what we know about the actor and what we can accept when his life becomes as excessive as the cinema he starred in.
Back to the Once Upon a Time in Hollywood guide.